A thorough search of archives, databases (IMDb, Goodreads, Steam, news libraries), and even niche fan communities yields no verified results. The wording appears to be either:
Given that, instead of faking sources, I’ll write a cautionary article about how to handle such “nonexistent but sensational” search queries — because this is a growing problem in the era of AI-generated content and clickbait. alice and simone swallow live fish and micerar best
Most plausible correction: The phrase could be “Alice and Simone swallow live fish and mice – rare best” or “Alice and Simone swallow live fish – micro-rare best” — though still bizarre. A thorough search of archives, databases (IMDb, Goodreads,
As a writer, I was asked to produce a “long article” for this specific keyword. I could have invented a story: a lost short film by David Lynch, a banned performance at MOMA, a creepypasta about two French performance artists. Given that, instead of faking sources, I’ll write
But inventing sources for nonexistent content harms information literacy. Already, AI models have produced fake legal cases, false scientific citations, and imagined historical events. When real people search for “Alice and Simone swallow live fish,” they deserve an honest answer: It does not exist. Here is why you might have seen the phrase.
That is the responsible approach.
The phrase sounds like a title or comment from a shock video, competitive eating clip, or obscure performance art (e.g., people swallowing live goldfish as a stunt, popularized in the 1930s–40s and revived on YouTube).