The term "hitlist" in the phrase "0day and hitlist week 01102024 work" refers to a curated list of targets—not just IP addresses, but specific assets considered vulnerable to the 0days listed above. According to threat intelligence feeds (e.g., Mandiant, CrowdStrike), the hitlist for this week contained three tiers:
While 0-day exploits and hitlists are potent tools in the hands of attackers, there are several strategies that can be employed to mitigate these threats:
As you move past the first week of October, do not archive this intelligence. The 0day and hitlist work of week 01102024 is not finished. 0day and hitlist week 01102024 work
The work continues. The 0days will fade, but the hitlist methodology—prioritized, targeted, and efficient—is here to stay.
Stay vigilant. Patch responsibly. Hunt the hitlist. The term "hitlist" in the phrase "0day and
About the author: This article was compiled from open-source intelligence (OSINT) and internal SOC reporting for the week ending October 6, 2024. For real-time updates on 0day vulnerabilities and active hitlists, subscribe to our daily bulletin.
The following is a detailed write-up regarding the 0day vulnerabilities and security hitlists relevant to the week of January 1, 2024 through January 7, 2024 (Week 01, 2024). The work continues
This period is historically significant in cybersecurity as it coincides with the Pwn2Own Vancouver 2024 "Call for Targets" and the publication of the Q1 2024 Hitlists by major security research entities. It also marks the first active exploitation periods for vulnerabilities disclosed in late December 2023.
A surprising entry. The hitlist included /api/v1/repos/search?uid= endpoints. Attackers scanned for exposed Gitea instances vulnerable to a 2023 race condition, combined with the Chromium 0day to steal API keys for software supply chain attacks.
0-day exploits refer to attacks that take advantage of a previously unknown vulnerability in a computer application, network, or hardware. The term "0-day" signifies that the exploit occurs on the same day a weakness is discovered, or even before a fix is available. This kind of exploit can be particularly devastating because the targeted software or hardware vendor may not have had any time (i.e., zero days) to develop and distribute a patch.
The speed from private disclosure to mass exploitation is now under 48 hours. The "work" cannot rely on vendors to release patches. Instead, organizations need behavioral baselines. The CLFS exploit, for example, triggered unusual PsSetCreateProcessNotifyRoutine calls. If you had EDR watching for that, you didn't need a signature.